the cell and the cpu in the 360 are both pile of poo when put next to pc cpus. you live in a lala land where you think spending $400-600 on a whole game system gets a a supercomputer quality cpu. fact of the matter is the cell in the ps3 is a super stripped down version, it is lacking MANY feature found in even pentium 1 processors, the biggest of which most likely being out-of-order processing. so to sum it up the crappy bare-bones cpus in game systems don't hold a candle to ANY modern PC mu...
go dig a hole and rot in it please. if every one was a dumb as you sony would be #1 right now and not forced to step up their game instead of being arrogant pricks. lucky for us 99% of the world is smarter.
pretty fancy
viva kicks ass i fully maxed out everything i could do on that game... waiting for some kind of expansion. dont knock it till you try it. its super deep and a great game.
i'm simply stating it isn't the cable that is making the difference. its not because the ps3 is MEANT to bo connected with HDMI, its because the ps3 is a b!tch to develop for and has a weaker gpu that is sony's fault an no one elses and this is what you get because of it. the ps3 is a GREAT blu-ray player i will give it that, but it is by no means the BEST GAMING machine this gen no matter what cable you hook up to it or what your fanboy affiliation is. the cables aren't making the ps3 have p...
"So you are saying the standard setup for a ps3 is something that only about 2% of the population has? How about this, most people DON'T HAVE HDMI 1.3 LET ALONE HDMI. So for like 98% of people that would buy EITHER system these are the images they will get. GOT IT? GOOD!
P.S. I'm sure the differences would be about exactly the same if you DID do a HDMI comparison. First the main difference for HDMI 1.3 is in the audio NOT video. Second the ps3 DOESN'T SHIP WITH AN HDMI CAB...
So you are saying the standard setup for a ps3 is something that only about 2% of the population has? How about this, most people DON'T HAVE HDMI 1.3 LET ALONE HDMI. So for like 98% of people that would buy EITHER system these are the images they will get. GOT IT? GOOD!
P.S. I'm sure the differences would be about exactly the same if you DID do a HDMI comparison. First the main difference in HDMI 1.3 is in the audio NOT video. Second the ps3 DOESN'T SHIP WITH AN HDMI CABLE hell...
well apparently you are not very good at math... lets see here 50 / 20 = 2.5 so if this data was not done procedurally that would mean that even a blu-ray disc could only do 2.5 tracks. not much of a game there is it? so obviously they are creating the textures some other way on the fly and the data uncompressed takes up 20gb meaning that this game will most likely require a HDD, however blu-ray i am sure will in no way be needed let a lone required. the 360 isn't in the clear though as it do...
You talk like you know something but it is VERY obvious that you DON'T. Shouldn't 12 year-olds be in school right now?
would you rather he support out of country companies instead of an in country one? so i suppose you think all of american jobs going to china is a good thing too... im not saying M$ or bush are the best of what they are but man, you have to draw a line, how much of a fanboy can you be?
let me clear this up for you a 50gb games does not = a good game. i mean sh!t the orginal mario was like 128kb and lets see rfom was like 3x the size data wise as gears but we all know what one is better... people buy into hype and marketing so easily. it makes me ashamed to be part of this group of 'gamers' mindless fools.
hunter you are a true fool if you think that the $600 ps3 can even hold a candle to a quad core dual video card 4gb+ ram pc. same goes for the 360 both were out dated the day they came out. the PC will always be #1 when it comes to raw power.
there are only so many fanboys to go around. once sony runs out... no one else will be willing to pay $600 for a system that has no games and doesnt push any better graphics than its $200 cheaper competitor. only fools... sorry fanboys would buy such a thing... and sadly for sony most of them already have... now the sales will do nothing but drop.
the option to sort market place content by price would be nice. as well as many of the things other people listed and the whole list from this news.
i think you hit the nail on the head.
...except M$ owns bungie...
so like 4 days ago that news post that was "ps3" only about 2 guitar hero videos of 2 diff songs was really the 360, they used one of the same pictures and in this you can clearly see the 360 behind that guy. why does everyone (devs) show off the 360 version of the game to the magazines? gta4, cod4, gh3, assasins creed... hmm i wonder.
how is it a bad thing? i mean unless one system (im looking at you ps3) gets crappy ports this is really only a plus the more people that get to play the better right?
mass effect is published by M$ ther is like 0% chance of it going to the ps3, that goes for the whole trilogy. deal with it. personally i would give up every ff and mgs game for mass effect, i love bioware rpgs, the best there are imho.
wow, what a tool you are. is it fun living in that little box where you only hear and see what you want to while this thing called "reality" is going on all around you?